What the gap costs, and what closing it returns.
Contingent workers wait days for access while billing from day one, administration runs on manual hours, and audits keep finding the same accounts. Trace where each cost sits, add them up, and a reliable six-figure annual number appears — one worth weighing against what closing the gap costs and returns.
- Why the total cost never lands on one desk — and how to assemble it.
- The visible cost floor at 200 contingent workers, line by line.
- The multi-million-dollar breach tail risk the operating model doesn't show.
- A four-step business case your team can build this week.
Let's Get Started!
Tell us a little about your environment and we'll tailor the walkthrough.
A six-figure cost hiding in three budgets — and the return on closing it.
The cost of the gap is spread across three budgets, so no one line ever looks big enough to fix. The paper assembles it and models the return across eight sections.
A six-figure cost, hiding in three budgets.
Admin labor, worker wait time, and audit remediation each sit with a different owner, so no one ever sees the sum.
The breach that starts with a forgotten account.
One incident from an orphaned account can cost more than the gap does in years of normal operation.
Recovered hours, faster starts, cleaner audits.
Each cost line has a matching return — most of it operational and visible the same quarter, not someday.
Written for the desk that signs the business case.
CFOs, COOs, and the Operations, Compliance, or IT leaders building the business case for closing the contingent-worker identity gap.
CFOs & COOs
Weigh a five-figure subscription against a six-figure cost and a multi-million-dollar tail risk.
Operations & Compliance
Supply the churn, wait-time, and audit numbers the case is built from.
IT leaders
Own the orphan rate and the admin hours the fix takes off the books.
Build the case on your own numbers.
Download the paper, or request a working
session and leave with your first-year return quantified at your scale.
